When to instruct
Medical records often hold evidence that matters to the defence: a long history of a condition, earlier injuries, prescribed medication, or a pattern of attendance. A GP or consultant can interpret the records and explain their significance in a form the court can rely on.
Typical questions
- What does the medical history show, and is it consistent with the defendant’s account?
- Could a medical condition explain the defendant’s behaviour, such as hypoglycaemia in diabetes or a seizure in epilepsy?
- Is there a medical reason for failing to provide a specimen, such as a respiratory condition?
- What is the nature of the injuries, and what mechanism is most likely to have caused them?
GP or consultant?
A GP is well suited to records-based reports and general medical history. Where the question needs specialist knowledge, such as the mechanism of a particular injury or the effects of a complex condition, we arrange a consultant in the relevant specialty.
What the report covers
- Chronology of relevant entries from the records
- Interpretation of findings
- Opinion on each question asked
- CrimPR Part 19 declaration
Common questions
Do you need consent to obtain records?
Yes. The defendant's signed consent is normally required. We can provide a template consent form.
Can a report be prepared from records alone?
Yes. Many records-based reports do not require an examination, which keeps costs down.